Comparison of Two Types of Suspension with Indirect Hydraulic Damping
نویسندگان
چکیده
منابع مشابه
comparison of the amount of debris extruded apically in two rotary techniques: flexmaster and m2
چکیده ندارد.
15 صفحه اولa comparison of teachers and supervisors, with respect to teacher efficacy and reflection
supervisors play an undeniable role in training teachers, before starting their professional experience by preparing them, at the initial years of their teaching by checking their work within the proper framework, and later on during their teaching by assessing their progress. but surprisingly, exploring their attributes, professional demands, and qualifications has remained a neglected theme i...
15 صفحه اولan investigation of the types of text reduction in subtitling: a case study of the persian film gilaneh with english subtitles
چکیده ندارد.
15 صفحه اولcomparison of catalytic activity of heteropoly compounds in the synthesis of bis(indolyl)alkanes.
heteropoly acids (hpa) and their salts have advantages as catalysts which make them both economically and environmentally attractive, strong br?nsted acidity, exhibiting fast reversible multi-electron redox transformations under rather mild conditions, very high solubility in polar solvents, fairly high thermal stability in the solid states, and efficient oxidizing ability, so that they are imp...
15 صفحه اولLinear Spring Oscillator with Two Different Types of Damping
This paper presents a simple, cheap and easily accessible demonstration experiment in two modifications. A typical example of a physical system for which damping forces have to be involved into equations is a damped spring mechanical oscillator. Here we use two models of the damping force, being produced by Foucault currents and by the force of the drag in air. It turns out, maybe as a slightly...
متن کاملذخیره در منابع من
با ذخیره ی این منبع در منابع من، دسترسی به آن را برای استفاده های بعدی آسان تر کنید
ژورنال
عنوان ژورنال: Transactions of the Japan Society of Mechanical Engineers
سال: 1959
ISSN: 0029-0270,2185-9485
DOI: 10.1299/kikai1938.25.741